Waiting for the Anger to Subside.

I’ve been waiting for the anger to subside.

For much of my career, I’ve witnessed the waste and distraction to American business caused by patent trolls and the burden they place on our judiciary. Despite my sometimes cynical attorney exterior, this year I had genuine hope that the U.S. Senate would finally make the legislative changes necessary to remedy this situation. After all, in an era when U.S. politicians can agree on very little, both the House and President came out strongly in favor of patent litigation reform. All that was left was Senate approval. Evidently the patent trolls were anticipating legislative reform as well. This graph (courtesy of Lex Machina)  shows the number of patent cases filed in Federal Court this calendar year. See that spike? Those are patent lawsuits filed immediately before the cutoff date for retroactive application of the fee shifting provision contained in the proposed Senate legislation.

2nd graph

But, in the end, the Senate, after extensive hearings and fact finding, chose not to take action. By doing nothing, the Senate decided that it values jobs for trial attorneys over jobs in STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics) and other areas of innovation.

Senate lobbying by trial attorneys against any type of legislative patent reform was expected.  But, I think many underestimated their influence, especially given the large number of American retail and tech companies that supported the legislation – the signatories to this letter, for example. Also of surprise was the opposition from colleges and universities, many of them public institutions who presumably want to see patent trolls continue to grow as a source for universities to monetize their patentable innovations.

Think about that last nugget for a moment.  Whether through tuition or taxes, we are all funding colleges and universities to educate our citizenry and create employment opportunities. Yet at the same time, many  of these same institutions are selling patents to patent trolls and actively opposing patent reform, and, as a consequence, supporting a system that diverts company resources from funding job creation to litigation defense.  Anyone see a conflict here?

But all is not gloom – far from it. In April, the Supreme Court, unlike Congress, chose to take action. In its decision in Octane Fitness v. Icon Health, the court expanded the circumstances under which a winning litigant can recover attorneys’ fees, helping to end the asymmetry on which patent trolls thrive. Since then a number of courts have taken this decision to heart and begun awarding fees. For my fellow in-house practitioners, make sure to read Judge Cote’s Opinion and Order in Lumen v. Findthebest.com. I’ve never met Judge Cote, but she has become my new judicial superhero.

And, at Adobe, we continue to channel our inner-Churchill (“…we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender…”) with great success. This year we have had four cases in which patent trolls requested a dismissal before trial – and Adobe paid nothing. In one case, we were successful in disqualifying a law firm representing a patent troll because the firm had previously represented Adobe. Then we took it a step further and sued the firm for recovery of our attorneys’ fees – and prevailed. In this battle, law firms need to decide whether they are going support patent trolls or companies. (For similar reasons, we have a policy at Adobe of not employing law firms who also represent patent trolls.)

Last week, I sat through extensive reviews in preparation for two patent troll cases that are scheduled for trial in late summer. In one case, Adobe is alleged as the patent infringer;  in the other, we are indemnifying one of our customers. In both, we are well represented, prepared and looking for our day in court.  If Congress won’t act, it is up to all of us to defend ourselves against these abuses. Patent litigation defense is expensive, time-consuming, and wasteful of resources. It can be tempting to just shell out a few dollars to make the current case go away.  But, for those that can afford it, standing up to the trolls is the right thing to do, and the only path forward.

 

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “Waiting for the Anger to Subside.

  1. Beowulf wannabe

    Nice, Mike! Well-measured disapprobation in your review of the Grendellians. Were I in your position, I sure would have been much more excoriating. Or, were you concerned that you, too, would be deemed a racist for including the word “troll” in your description of the despicable actions of so many (Senate, trial lawyers, academia). I sure wish those on the letter-list would withhold ALL contributions to Senate campaigns and endowments of those responsible for the Senate “inactivity.”

  2. Must be a principled and disinterested argument in favor of the current system somewhere, anywhere. But it does not exactly leap from the screen. Thoughts?

  3. Nancy

    Alas, yet another disappointment in our so-called ‘government’. It is admirable Adobe dares to fight the good cause and expose the trolls for what they really are… bullies and, yes, cowards. Love it when they are forced to back down. Squash ‘em like bugs, Adobe ! Would that more companies be so bold.

  4. U. Dick

    Mike just keep hitting the wall one of these days it will start to crack and then the whole thing will fall. Don’t expect it to happen real soon but if you give up it will never happen.

    Big hug,
    U. Dick

    P.S. Right On Beowulf wannabe

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s